• Smid Signed, Whitney Next?

    by Tyler Dellow • April 1, 2013 • Hockey • 8 Comments

    Last year, after it looked like the Oilers would trade Ales Hemsky and didn’t and then it looked like they’d draft Ryan Murray and they didn’t, Backhand Shelf’s Ellen Etchingham made fun of the tendency of Oilers’ fans to expect the worst and start reacting to it before it even happens. I am, of course, a subscriber to Colby Cosh’s description of Oiler fans:

    The Edmonton Oiler fan has been chosen for a special role in the dramaturgy of the National Hockey League. It is a role which fits him well. He is the modern analogue of the Russian serf–the man so preposterously incapable of resisting his own mistreatment at the hands of blackmailing capitalists and money-engorged players that a pan-global hockey revolution had to be concocted for his sake. Little can he guess what the wind will blow to the doorstep of his frost-laced lair; his instinct tells him that it cannot be anything too good. In a fog of superstitious inarticulacy, he awaits the hammerblow of history.

    Cosh wrote this in 2005; as an Oiler fan might have unreasonably feared at the time, the pan-global hockey revolution that was concocted for our sake worked out for us about as well as the Russian Revolution worked out for Ivan Six Pack and the Oilers had the worst record between the lockouts. Those who don’t follow the Oilers closely, who just sort of check in from time, probably aren’t aware of how the last 25 years has basically been a series of Very Bad Things, conditioning us to expect the worst.

    But Hemsky stayed and the Oilers drafted Nail Yakupov and as we waited to find out if Ladislav Smid would sign, I thought back to Ellen’s point and remained positive that Smid would sign. Sure enough, he signed a very Oiler-friendly contract today, signing a four year deal worth $3.5MM per year without an NTC or an NMC. Part of me wonders the extent to which Steve Tambellini just lucks into these things – Hemsky and Smid, for whatever reason, were willing to take less to be in Edmonton and I’ve got serious doubts that he was the guy who wanted Yakupov but whatever, it seems to have worked.

    Which brings me to Ryan Whitney. I’ve been fooling around with data on defencemen lately, as I think it’s an area that people with an interest in hockey analytics have done the least in terms of trying to find solid indicia of who can play and who can’t. I happened to have some data handy with respect to Whitney and thought I’d assemble it for readers.

    For those, like me, who sometimes have trouble keeping the significant events in Ryan Whitney’s history straight: Whitney had an osteotomy on his left foot in August of 2008. On February 26, 2009, he was traded from the Pittsburgh Penguins to the Anaheim Ducks. On March 3, 2010, he was traded from the Ducks to the Edmonton Oilers. In May of 2010, he had an osteotomy on his right foot. On December 28, 2010, he injured his right ankle and required surgery.

    As I said, I don’t know that we know a lot about defencemen and evaluating them with data yet. That being said, I’m kind of struck by how terrible Ryan Whitney’s numbers are. His Corsi% is just ludicrously bad. I’ve been looking at the idea of sorting defencemen by TOI/G into three groups and then looking at Corsi and Whitney has horrific numbers: in 2007-08, he’s 79 out of 80 second tier defencemen. In 2008-09, he’s 67/73 first tier defencemen, in 2009-10, he’s 60/69 first tier defencemen, in 2010-11 he’s 69/71 first tier defencemen and last year he was 67/67 first tier defencemen.

    One of the hangups I have with using data to evaluate defencemen is that Corsi is pretty team/partner dependent. In Whitney’s case, that’s not as applicable: he’s played in three different cities, on teams ranging from Stanley Cup Champions to Draft Lottery Champions and he’s posted terrible, horrible numbers everywhere he’s gone.

    It’s hard to even make an argument for Whitney on the basis of RelCorsi. The idea behind relative Corsi is that some good players play on bad teams and that if a guy is on a bad team but he makes it better when he’s on the ice, he’s probably driving things the right way, even though his numbers look terrible. Whitney’s been bad to terrible at this in four of his six years. Shea Weber, to pick one example, had a RelCorsi of +11.2 last year, despite a Corsi% of less than 50%. You can reasonably infer that Weber’s probably playing a role in hauling the Predators forward.

    I don’t know what kind of a defence you can make of Ryan Whitney other than that he can make a pass. Even then, that doesn’t seem to help him avoid spending most of every game in his own end of the ice. It’s interesting that he has a 10% on-ice shooting percentage over the past six years; I tend not to think that defencemen can drive this and that Whitney’s number is randomness. If you asked me to predict his GF/GA numbers going forward, they’d be horrible.

    With Smid done, Whitney’s the next issue to be resolved on the Oilers’ blue line. To me, he’s a guy who does something that gets NHL types interested but obscures the fact that he’s terrible: he can pass the puck. If I were the Oilers and there was a second or third round pick available for him, I’d view it as someone offering me a free asset and taking a million bucks worth of salary off my hands and jump on it. Yes, the Oilers lose the passing ability but they’re well stocked with defencemen who spend too much time in their own end and, for as gorgeous as his passes are, that’s what the data says Whitney is: a sort of Jason Strudwick with style points.

    Of course, if the “Tambellini isn’t crazy like a fox and just lucked/got ordered into some moves that worked lately” theory is right, the Oilers will probably think that they like the way things are going of late, Whitney has been an Oiler of late, so why not extend him on a one year deal if he’ll take it? You pay him less for next year, you can still trade him for something then and you don’t mess with what works.

    That’s the easy way (and the one that blithely assumes that there will be a market for Ryan Whitney next year if he’s in and out of the lineup all year and gets lits up). The harder way would be to say “Look, we’re in a playoff hunt but there are parts of this team that work and parts that don’t work and we need to excise the parts of this team that don’t work.” The middle ground would be not signing him and not trading him – another 14 games worth of assessing. To me, this is a pretty easy question: trade him and move on. In my bones though, I expect bad things when it comes to the Oilers, regardless of recent trends.

    Email Tyler Dellow at mc79hockey@gmail.com

    About Tyler Dellow

    8 Responses to Smid Signed, Whitney Next?

    1. Woodguy
      April 1, 2013 at

      Wilson getting rid of Murray is how getting rid of Whitney should be viewed.

      Murray’s RelCor in the past 6 seasons

      2007-2008 Season -4.1
      2008-2009 Season -3
      2009-2010 Season -1.5
      2010-2011 Season -5.9
      2011-2012 Season -16.2
      2012-2013 Season -19

      Fell off the cliff in 11/12 which can happen to older, slower Dmen who rely on being physical to play.

      Wilson gets a ridiculous 2 2nds for him and everyone calls Shero a genius. Amazing.

      Using the deadline to unload your trash for a price that would be laughed at in June, even if you are in the playoff hunt should now be called “Wilsoning”, or to “Wilson” someone.

      “Did you hear the Kipper went to TOR for a 2nd? Man, did Feaster ever Wilson Nonis there”

      In terms of Tambellini liking what he sees lately, Whitney was +2 in Corsi events vs. CBJ and +5 vs VAN.

      I hope the Hockey Gord causes a GM to put a stupid offer in for Whitney that even Tambellini cannot refuse.

    2. Woodguy
      April 1, 2013 at

      As I was typing the last comment WIlson traded Handzus to CHI

      Handzus’ RelCor last few years

      2007-2008 Season -14.7
      2008-2009 Season -9.9
      2009-2010 Season -13.6
      2010-2011 Season -13.1
      2011-2012 Season -20.5
      2012-2013 Season -14.1

      According to many, CHI employs their own set of fancystat guys. Many move they make look right out of the fancystat handbook (i.e. Frolik)

      This one though, stinks.

      Even Bowman can get Wilsoned.

      • Anonymous
        April 1, 2013 at

        Adjusted for zonestarts?

        • Woodguy
          April 2, 2013 at

          Good point. A little context-less there.

          Here’s the same chart with his ZS%

          2007-2008Season -14.7 43.3
          2008-2009 Season -9.9 44.1
          2009-2010 Season -13.6 46.1
          2010-2011 Season -13.1 43.5
          2011-2012 Season -20.5 46.8
          2012-2013 Season -14.1 49.2

          While he still gets the shitty end of the stick, its not the Maholtra treatment.

      • Triumph
        April 2, 2013 at

        I kinda hate using Corsi Rel for forwards because you shouldn’t expect your 3rd and 4th lines to put up the same kind of Corsi your top line is, if your team is any good. I agree that Handzus’s best days are well behind him, but at least with defensemen they typically play with all the forwards so their teammates are more spread out. Not the case for forwards.

        • Woodguy
          April 2, 2013 at

          That is usually true as well, but I’m assuming most reading here are familiar with “normal-ish” ranges and add that to the “buckets” Tyler is creating and the expectations are more clear.

          We need to have some short hand or else every post has to have all the disclaimers about what not to read into it.

          For more context, here’s the RelCor and raw corsi of every SJS forward who played 20+ games in 11/12

          JOETHORNTON 14.9 14.9
          TOMMYWINGELS 9 12.54
          JOEPAVELSKI 11.1 12.32
          LOGANCOUTURE 10.6 12.08
          PATRICKMARLEAU 8.1 10.22
          RYANECLOWE 2.2 5.99
          DANIELWINNIK 3.9 4.8
          ANDREWMURRAY -0.1 4.45
          ANDREWDESJARDINS -2.3 3.18
          BRADWINCHESTER -5.3 0.82
          BENNFERRIERO -3.3 0.6
          MARTINHAVLAT 0.4 0.54
          T.J.GALIARDI -4.8 -0.38
          TORREYMITCHELL -7.7 -0.48
          DOMINICMOORE -6.4 -5.8
          MICHALHANDZUS -20.5 -9.96

          Also,

          For fun have a look at the RelCor of CHI vis a vi which line they play on.

          Their “lesser lights” are dominating the dregs of others.

          Bollig (in AHL now) and Frolik (was playing 4th most of the year) are skewing things for the other lines.

          Hossa, Toews, and Saad ripping it up vs other’s best up there as well.

    3. Sliderule
      April 1, 2013 at

      Whitney can pass and he can jump into the play.

      Can’t play defense worth a lick.

      Trade him!

    4. jay headley
      April 2, 2013 at

      If we can get a second rounder for him im all over it!
      bye bye whitney

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *