• Scoring Chances: G48, at Phx, Jan 25th

    by Dennis • January 25, 2011 • Uncategorized • 9 Comments

    Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20741

    Team Period Time Note EDM Opponent  
    PHX 1 19:29 13 28 40 49 77 85 14 20 22 30 33 55 5v5
    EDM 1 18:32 27 2 4 10 26 27 40 3 11 13 17 30 53 5v5
    PHX 1 17:39 22 40 46 49 77 89 8 18 19 30 55 91 5v5
    PHX 1 16:15 2 13 26 28 40 85 3 14 20 22 30 53 5v5
    PHX 1 16:08 2 13 26 28 40 85 3 14 20 22 30 53 5v5
    PHX 1 14:33 PP Goal 13 40 49 77 85 3 8 19 22 30 91 4v5
    EDM 1 13:29 4 4 10 27 40 49 77 3 8 19 30 53 91 5v5
    PHX 1 8:55 2 26 28 40 89 91 11 13 17 18 23 30 5v5
    PHX 1 8:01 13 28 40 49 77 85 3 14 20 22 30 53 5v5
    PHX 1 6:31 2 13 26 28 40 85 12 23 26 28 30 33 5v5
    PHX 1 5:10 4 5 10 27 40 58 14 20 22 30 33 55 5v5
    PHX 1 4:30 4 10 27 40 49 77 14 20 22 30 33 55 5v5
    PHX 1 2:28 PP 2 13 16 40 77 8 22 23 30 33 91 4v5
    EDM 1 1:30 4 4 5 10 27 40 58 14 20 28 30 53 55 5v5
    PHX 1 0:37 2 23 40 77 89 91 3 11 13 22 30 53 5v5
    EDM 2 19:29 85 13 28 40 49 77 85 14 20 22 30 33 55 5v5
    EDM 2 18:49 27 4 5 10 27 40 58 3 11 13 17 30 53 5v5
    PHX 2 18:06 4 5 10 23 40 58 3 13 17 30 53 91 5v5
    PHX 2 17:41 2 23 26 40 89 91 8 18 19 23 30 91 5v5
    PHX 2 15:32 2 13 23 26 40 91 11 14 18 22 23 30 5v5
    EDM 2 14:33 23 23 40 49 77 89 91 11 13 17 23 30 33 5v5
    EDM 2 12:52 22 2 16 22 26 40 46 3 8 19 30 53 91 5v5
    EDM 2 12:51 46 2 16 22 26 40 46 3 8 19 30 53 91 5v5
    EDM 2 12:49 Goal 22 2 16 22 26 40 46 3 8 19 30 53 91 5v5
    EDM 2 11:44 28 5 13 28 40 58 85 14 20 22 30 33 55 5v5
    PHX 2 11:12 2 13 26 28 40 85 3 14 20 22 30 53 5v5
    PHX 2 11:08 2 13 26 28 40 85 3 14 20 22 30 53 5v5
    EDM 2 10:56 85 2 13 26 28 40 85 3 11 14 22 30 53 5v5
    EDM 2 7:21 89 5 23 40 58 89 91 14 18 20 22 23 30 5v5
    PHX 2 6:48 5 23 40 58 89 91 14 20 22 23 30 33 5v5
    EDM 2 0:33 28 2 13 28 40 77 85 8 18 19 23 30 91 5v5
    PHX 3 19:45 13 28 40 49 77 85 14 20 22 30 33 55 5v5
    EDM 3 18:53 27 4 5 10 27 40 58 3 11 13 17 30 53 5v5
    EDM 3 17:04 Goal PP 4 4 10 27 40 58 77 14 18 26 30 53 5v4
    EDM 3 15:52 Goal 23 23 40 49 77 89 91 11 13 17 30 33 55 5v5
    EDM 3 15:24 4 4 5 10 27 40 58 3 14 20 22 30 53 5v5
    PHX 3 12:19 2 5 16 40 46 85 3 11 13 17 30 53 5v5
    PHX 3 11:31 Goal 13 28 40 49 77 85 3 8 19 30 53 91 5v5
    EDM 3 11:15 28 2 13 26 28 40 85 8 19 30 33 55 91 5v5
    EDM 3 11:10 85 2 13 26 28 40 85 8 19 30 33 55 91 5v5
    PHX 3 9:29 27 40 49 77 89 91 3 11 13 17 30 53 5v5
    EDM 3 8:28 10 2 4 10 27 40 77 14 20 22 30 33 55 5v5
    PHX 3 7:24 5 23 40 58 89 91 3 11 13 17 30 53 5v5
    PHX 3 5:52 4 5 10 27 40 58 14 20 22 30 33 55 5v5
    EDM 3 4:57 19 2 4 10 26 27 40 14 26 28 30 33 55 5v5
    PHX 3 2:32 85 2 13 26 28 40 85 14 20 22 30 33 55 5v5
    PHX 3 1:15 5 13 28 40 58 85 11 13 17 30 33 55 5v5
    EDM 3 0:22 Goal 27 4 10 27 40 49 77 3 14 20 22 30 53 5v5
    # Player EV PP SH
    2 J. VANDERMEER 17:28 10 11 0:02 0 0 0:49 0 1
    4 T. HALL 17:49 9 4 2:49 1 0 0:00 0 0
    5 L. SMID 18:07 6 7 1:24 0 0 1:22 0 0
    10 S. HORCOFF 16:38 9 4 3:10 1 0 0:00 0 0
    13 A. COGLIANO 15:55 6 12 0:02 0 0 1:49 0 2
    16 C. FRASER 4:34 3 1 0:00 0 0 1:29 0 1
    22 J. JACQUES 4:38 3 1 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
    23 L. OMARK 14:10 3 6 2:29 0 0 0:00 0 0
    26 K. FOSTER 14:03 8 9 3:09 0 0 0:00 0 0
    27 D. PENNER 17:26 9 4 2:49 1 0 0:00 0 0
    28 R. JONES 14:42 6 12 0:02 0 0 0:52 0 0
    40 D. DUBNYK 51:59 21 24 5:20 1 0 2:41 0 2
    46 Z. STORTINI 4:52 3 2 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
    49 T. PECKHAM 17:09 5 7 0:02 0 0 1:20 0 1
    58 J. PETRY 19:20 6 6 2:09 1 0 0:21 0 0
    77 T. GILBERT 17:51 7 8 3:54 1 0 1:30 0 2
    85 L. REDDOX 14:31 6 12 0:02 0 0 1:12 0 1
    89 S. GAGNER 15:09 3 7 2:08 0 0 0:00 0 0
    91 M. PAAJARVI 15:33 3 7 2:29 0 0 0:00 0 0
    Period Totals EV PP 5v3 PP SH 5v3 SH
    1 3 12 3 10 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
    2 10 6 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    3 9 8 8 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    Totals 22 26 21 24 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0

    9 Responses to Scoring Chances: G48, at Phx, Jan 25th

    1. January 25, 2011 at

      4-10-27
      91-89-23
      28-13-85
      22-16-46

      49-77
      5-58
      2-26

      Khabby-DD

    2. January 25, 2011 at

      For those wondering why the 13 or 89 lines didn’t do better it was hard to climb out of the huge 3/10 EV chances hole that the Oilers dug for themselves in the first 20 min and the 89 line can look great in the O zone but they also give up a lot.

      What I liked about tonight’s game was the last time the Oilers took the boots at Phx I remarked to friend how the Yotes D looked easy to work down low but the Oilers never bothered to try it out. Tonight that seemed to be the plan as Edmonton cycled and worked and waited for the coverage to break down.

    3. January 26, 2011 at

      Boy, those lines stick together like glue! You see the same thing in ZoneStarts and EV Corsi for the most part – all three guys with very similar numbers. No MacBlender on this club!

    4. RiversQ
      January 26, 2011 at

      The Oilers just can’t seem to get two decent lines. For all the raving about 91-89-23, it seems the best they can hope for is even on chances. The bottom six just stinks.

    5. Alex Hemsky
      January 26, 2011 at

      Over the last 10 games it seems like the 4th line has been holding their own, especially with 33 out.

    6. dawgbone
      January 26, 2011 at

      I think I’m going to crusade for the return of Arnott on a 2 year deal this summer!

      Penner-Arnott-Hemsky
      Hall-Horcoff-Eberle
      Pajaarvi-Gagner-Omark
      Jones-Cogliano-Reddox

      With all the young guys being a year older, I think this forward group might be good enough for a playoff spot.

      It would keep 91-89-23 a little more sheltered, and they might be in a position where they can beat up on the soft opp.

    7. dawgbone
      January 26, 2011 at

      @Alex

      Yup, even Jacques looks like an NHL player (albeit a bottom 3 one) the last little while.

    8. January 26, 2011 at

      In looking at last night and 49′s last few games – and in understanding there’s 34 more to go – you might have to think about a 49-58 third pairing for 2012 and getting two real D to compliment 6-77 up in the top two pairings.

      All of our first round pick or 5 or 89 could be play in order to get the things that we need. Furthermore, as soon as 14-83 get back to flesh out the wings then we should see 4 play pivot for the rest of the season just to see if he can handle it.

      If he can then we have 4-10 down the middle and we decide how we go after the other primary pivot and who we give up for him. Right now it’s 10 plus two kids who are trying to find their way but it’s tough sledding faceoff wise.

      I’m not as down on 89 as some others but if 4 can hang then we can go 4-10 down the middle plus an Arnott or Handzus and 13 can hang around as the 4th line pivot

      DB: what does Arnott have left in the tank?

      AH: Yes, it appears that they’ve been playing better and the optics would be even better if Renney was really trying to match lines and wasn’t letting them get caught on occasion.

      I’m not overly impressed with him just because of what’s going on with the ST but if he’s not matching lines next year I hope he’s fired.

      Here’s what I’d go with if 14-83 come back at the same time

      27-4-14

      91-10-83

      28-89-23

      16-13-85

      Note: I’d bring up Hartkinianen, sp:) if we move 16.

    9. dawgbone
      January 26, 2011 at

      Not sure Dennis, he had 2 pretty solid years before heading to New Jersey and everyone on that team has fallen down an elevator shaft this year.

      I think he’s got enough in him to be a #2 tough minutes C on this team.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *