Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20222
| Team |
Period |
Time |
Note |
EDM |
Opponent |
|
| EDM |
1 |
18:35 |
14 |
4 |
5 |
13 |
14 |
26 |
35 |
13 |
28 |
35 |
40 |
52 |
96 |
5v5 |
| DET |
1 |
16:12 |
|
5 |
26 |
27 |
35 |
83 |
89 |
5 |
23 |
26 |
35 |
51 |
93 |
5v5 |
| DET |
1 |
16:00 |
|
4 |
6 |
13 |
14 |
35 |
43 |
5 |
13 |
23 |
35 |
40 |
96 |
5v5 |
| EDM |
1 |
15:29 |
14 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
13 |
14 |
35 |
5 |
13 |
23 |
35 |
40 |
96 |
5v5 |
| DET |
1 |
12:31 |
Goal |
4 |
13 |
14 |
35 |
43 |
77 |
5 |
23 |
26 |
35 |
51 |
93 |
5v5 |
| EDM |
1 |
11:28 |
67 |
2 |
6 |
28 |
35 |
67 |
91 |
11 |
24 |
35 |
44 |
55 |
90 |
5v5 |
| DET |
1 |
6:32 |
Goal |
4 |
5 |
13 |
14 |
26 |
35 |
5 |
13 |
23 |
35 |
40 |
96 |
5v5 |
| DET |
1 |
6:31 |
|
4 |
5 |
13 |
14 |
26 |
35 |
5 |
13 |
23 |
35 |
40 |
96 |
5v5 |
| EDM |
1 |
5:13 |
83 |
5 |
26 |
27 |
35 |
83 |
89 |
5 |
13 |
23 |
35 |
40 |
96 |
5v5 |
| EDM |
1 |
4:52 |
83 |
2 |
27 |
35 |
77 |
83 |
89 |
5 |
13 |
23 |
35 |
40 |
96 |
5v5 |
| DET |
1 |
3:30 |
|
4 |
6 |
13 |
14 |
35 |
49 |
24 |
26 |
35 |
51 |
55 |
93 |
5v5 |
| DET |
1 |
3:22 |
Goal |
4 |
6 |
13 |
14 |
35 |
49 |
26 |
28 |
35 |
51 |
52 |
93 |
5v5 |
| DET |
2 |
18:23 |
|
4 |
6 |
13 |
14 |
35 |
49 |
28 |
35 |
40 |
44 |
52 |
90 |
5v5 |
| DET |
2 |
17:42 |
Goal |
4 |
13 |
14 |
35 |
43 |
77 |
11 |
24 |
35 |
44 |
55 |
90 |
5v5 |
| DET |
2 |
17:21 |
|
5 |
26 |
28 |
35 |
67 |
91 |
8 |
20 |
24 |
35 |
43 |
55 |
5v5 |
| EDM |
2 |
15:05 |
14 |
4 |
6 |
13 |
14 |
26 |
35 |
11 |
23 |
35 |
44 |
55 |
90 |
5v5 |
| DET |
2 |
14:40 |
|
6 |
28 |
35 |
43 |
67 |
91 |
11 |
24 |
35 |
44 |
55 |
90 |
5v5 |
| DET |
2 |
13:52 |
|
2 |
4 |
5 |
13 |
14 |
35 |
8 |
20 |
28 |
35 |
43 |
52 |
5v5 |
| EDM |
2 |
11:02 |
83 |
5 |
26 |
27 |
35 |
83 |
89 |
5 |
11 |
23 |
35 |
44 |
90 |
5v5 |
| EDM |
2 |
10:23 |
13 |
5 |
13 |
14 |
26 |
27 |
35 |
11 |
23 |
28 |
35 |
44 |
90 |
5v5 |
| DET |
2 |
4:50 |
|
5 |
26 |
28 |
35 |
67 |
91 |
11 |
24 |
35 |
44 |
52 |
90 |
5v5 |
| DET |
2 |
3:51 |
PP |
2 |
16 |
27 |
35 |
43 |
|
5 |
13 |
28 |
35 |
40 |
96 |
4v5 |
| DET |
2 |
3:00 |
PP |
2 |
5 |
14 |
28 |
35 |
|
26 |
35 |
51 |
55 |
90 |
93 |
4v5 |
| DET |
2 |
2:57 |
Goal PP |
2 |
5 |
14 |
28 |
35 |
|
26 |
35 |
51 |
55 |
90 |
93 |
4v5 |
| DET |
2 |
2:11 |
|
4 |
6 |
35 |
49 |
67 |
91 |
8 |
11 |
24 |
35 |
44 |
52 |
5v5 |
| EDM |
2 |
0:51 |
PP 26 |
6 |
14 |
26 |
28 |
35 |
67 |
13 |
24 |
35 |
40 |
55 |
|
5v4 |
| EDM |
3 |
19:02 |
Goal 27 PP |
6 |
26 |
27 |
35 |
83 |
89 |
20 |
24 |
35 |
43 |
55 |
|
5v4 |
| DET |
3 |
15:12 |
|
4 |
5 |
13 |
14 |
26 |
35 |
8 |
20 |
28 |
35 |
43 |
52 |
5v5 |
| DET |
3 |
15:11 |
|
4 |
5 |
13 |
14 |
26 |
35 |
8 |
20 |
28 |
35 |
43 |
52 |
5v5 |
| DET |
3 |
13:05 |
|
4 |
16 |
26 |
35 |
46 |
49 |
5 |
23 |
26 |
35 |
51 |
93 |
5v5 |
| EDM |
3 |
12:31 |
83 |
6 |
27 |
35 |
43 |
83 |
89 |
5 |
23 |
26 |
35 |
51 |
93 |
5v5 |
| DET |
3 |
3:20 |
Goal |
2 |
28 |
35 |
67 |
77 |
91 |
13 |
24 |
35 |
40 |
55 |
96 |
5v5 |
| EDM |
3 |
1:15 |
Goal 49 |
6 |
14 |
35 |
49 |
89 |
91 |
24 |
26 |
35 |
51 |
55 |
93 |
5v5 |
| # |
Player |
EV |
PP |
SH |
| 2 |
J. VANDERMEER |
13:40 |
3 |
2 |
0:00 |
0 |
0 |
1:01 |
0 |
3 |
| 4 |
T. HALL |
17:36 |
3 |
13 |
1:39 |
0 |
0 |
0:00 |
0 |
0 |
| 5 |
L. SMID |
15:14 |
4 |
8 |
0:57 |
0 |
0 |
0:46 |
0 |
2 |
| 6 |
R. WHITNEY |
17:30 |
5 |
6 |
4:23 |
2 |
0 |
0:40 |
0 |
0 |
| 13 |
A. COGLIANO |
13:21 |
4 |
11 |
1:39 |
0 |
0 |
0:00 |
0 |
0 |
| 14 |
J. EBERLE |
15:52 |
5 |
11 |
2:22 |
1 |
0 |
0:46 |
0 |
2 |
| 16 |
C. FRASER |
10:29 |
0 |
1 |
0:00 |
0 |
0 |
0:48 |
0 |
1 |
| 26 |
K. FOSTER |
14:44 |
5 |
8 |
4:49 |
2 |
0 |
0:00 |
0 |
0 |
| 27 |
D. PENNER |
16:45 |
5 |
1 |
2:44 |
1 |
0 |
0:55 |
0 |
1 |
| 28 |
R. JONES |
12:19 |
1 |
4 |
1:33 |
1 |
0 |
0:34 |
0 |
2 |
| 35 |
N. KHABIBULIN |
52:23 |
10 |
18 |
5:56 |
2 |
0 |
1:41 |
0 |
3 |
| 43 |
J. STRUDWICK |
13:52 |
1 |
4 |
0:00 |
0 |
0 |
0:55 |
0 |
1 |
| 46 |
Z. STORTINI |
10:12 |
0 |
1 |
0:00 |
0 |
0 |
0:00 |
0 |
0 |
| 49 |
T. PECKHAM |
14:05 |
1 |
5 |
0:01 |
0 |
0 |
0:00 |
0 |
0 |
| 67 |
G. BRULE |
12:09 |
1 |
5 |
1:33 |
1 |
0 |
0:00 |
0 |
0 |
| 77 |
T. GILBERT |
15:41 |
1 |
3 |
1:42 |
0 |
0 |
0:00 |
0 |
0 |
| 83 |
A. HEMSKY |
14:21 |
4 |
1 |
2:52 |
1 |
0 |
0:19 |
0 |
0 |
| 89 |
S. GAGNER |
17:17 |
5 |
1 |
2:44 |
1 |
0 |
0:00 |
0 |
0 |
| 91 |
M. PAAJARVI |
16:48 |
2 |
5 |
0:42 |
0 |
0 |
0:00 |
0 |
0 |
| Period |
Totals |
EV |
PP |
5v3 PP |
SH |
5v3 SH |
| 1 |
5 |
7 |
5 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 2 |
4 |
10 |
3 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
| 3 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Totals |
12 |
21 |
10 |
18 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
4-13-14
27-89-83
91-67-28
43-16-46
6-49
5-26
2-77
Khabby-DD
It was a great night for the 4-13-14 line!
Well, at least Penner, Gagner and Hemsky had a good night.
Gilbert – 3 chances against, 3 goals against
Good thing we got that MVP-calibre goaltending backing the guys up.
Bruce: things are certainly tough all over and not that it matters but I wonder what the home crowd’s reaction would or will be if 10 or 83 are out for a little while and that have to watch this stuff happen at Rexall?
Rebuilds are fine as long as you can sleep through them but you get a situation like this one where we’re so thin on experience at F and just thin on talent at D and no one can kill a penalty and yet there’s still 68 games of this to go through.
WOWY for Horcoff with kids is going to be staggering for this year.
Nice to see Detroit refrain from taking their proverbial foot off the throat of the Oilers. Not much score effect here.
Score effects? Whazzat?
Shots in Carolina:
EDM 9- 7 -6 = 22
CAR 12-14-16 = 42
Got worse as the night went along on both sides of the shot clock.
Last night:
EDM 10 -8 -7 = 25
DET 13-14- 7 = 34
That suggests Wings called off the dogs a little in the third, and it did show up on the scoreboard (Oilers actually “won” that period 2-1 after having outright lost the previous five), but once again there was Zero doubt as to which was the superior squad.
Chances thus far:
Hemsky With Penner: .596
Hemsky with Horcoff: .600
Hemsky without Penner: .364
Hemsky without Penner or Horcoff: .167
Well, I guess it’s more like WOWY for the entire real top line. Since the gap is great between any of the top three and their next best replacement at LW, RW or C, it’s really not too surprising.
Chances thus far:
Penner With Hemsky: .596
Penner without Hemsky: .500
Penner with Horcoff: .400
Penner without Horcoff: .582
Penner without Hemsky or Horcoff: .533
I think that’s my queue to stop reading into small sample sizes.