Bill Blair, at a media display of the weapons seized in Toronto over the weekend, said this:
“Some people came to Toronto not to protest around a specific issue or to advocate for any change,” Blair told a lobby full of reporters and colleagues. “They came to attack our city. They came to attack the summit. They came to commit crimes and to victimize people in this city. The evidence of their intent is on display before you today.”
The cache of items “demonstrates the extent of the criminal conspiracy that existed and was dealt with over the course of this weekend in which people came to this city, conspired and agreed together and came with ample preparation to wreak havoc and to commit crimes in our city,” Blair said.
“No one should be so naive as to think that this is the actions of (people) whose purpose was to engage in lawful, peaceful protest,” Blair said. “I think the evidence that is displayed before you of weaponry, of items that could be used to destroy property, to attack the police and the public, items capable of delivering deadly force, truly demonstrates the extent of this criminal conspiracy and the intent of those who came to engage in this conduct.”
Right. But then this came up:
Police also displayed a crossbow and chainsaw seized in an incident on Friday that they said had no ties to the summit. When asked, Chief Blair acknowledged they were unrelated, but said “everything else” had been confiscated from demonstrators.
Well, anyone can make a mistake. Surely everything else was…what? Next paragraph in that story:
On Wednesday, however, Michael Went and Doug Kerr e-mailed a letter to Chief Blair saying their bamboo poles may have been included in the exhibit. As they headed to a picnic to commemorate the 1969 Stonewall riots on Sunday morning, police seized seven or eight of the long poles, citing the G20 summit. The couple had planned to use the poles to fly a rainbow flag and decorate the park.
Huh. Well, maybe that’s a mistake. Maybe the bamboo poles were supposed to be in the bamboo pole display and were simply misplaced. It’s not like he vividly described them as weapons when the police information was that they were not. No, he saved that for something else:
Brian Barrett was shocked to go online Tuesday and see a photo gallery showing toy weapons seized from him while en route to Mississauga for a fantasy role-playing game.
His hand-made scale armour, cushion-tipped arrows and hockey-taped shields were among the items Toronto Police chief Bill Blair said were “seized from criminals” who wreaked havoc on the city Saturday.
…
“Some of the things that are related are these arrows with devices tied on to them so that they could pour gas on them, ignite them and shoot them at us,” Blair said. “That was seized from criminals.”
Not so, said Barrett, “champion of Twilight Peak” and weapons safety officer for a 15th century role-playing game called Amtgard.
I don’t know what’s worse - the fact that Toronto appears to have a police chief who is a liar (we know that from the fence thing) or that Toronto has a police chief who might be subject to paranoid fantasies about the police being assaulted with flaming arrows, despite those arrows having been seized days before the G20 Summit from someone with a plausible explanation for possessing them who presumably provided that explanation to the police during the hour in which he was detained by them.
































