• SAA/100 – Pietrangelo, Gagner, Lidstrom And More

    by  • September 20, 2013 • Hockey • 23 Comments

    With the boring theory part of SAA/100 out of the way (except for one point, which I’ll deal with below), it’s time for the fun stuff: results. After I posted the theory post, I got a bunch of requests on Twitter for data relating to specific players. It turns out that it’s kind of fun to look guys up, so I figured I’d do a post with some numbers for specific players that touches on some things.

    Vegetables first though. In a comment to the previous post, which was picked up by Tom Tango, a concern was expressed about the first shot effect. Tom expresses it rather succinctly, so I’ll quote him:

    if you have the NY Eve Russians v Canadiens on the ice, they wouldn’t need that second shot, because the first shot would have produced a goal. So, they are “bad” at creating multiple shots, only because they made sure that they got a good first shot off.

    Now, keep in mind that this is a defensive stat. So if there is a NY Eve Russians team out there, a team’s only playing a small part of its schedule against that team. Also keep in mind that it’s questionable in today’s NHL that teams exist that pass the puck into the net, as the old Russians used to do. It’s also questionable just how much the Russians actually did that – my buddy Pat McLean did a breakdown of the 1972 Summit Series, where the Russians were supposedly much the same way, and counted scoring chances. This was his conclusion:

    This was Canada’s series from start to finish. Only in game five, which Sinden would later call Canada’s best game (?!), were the Canadians outchanced (and badly for that matter) at ES. Throw that game out and the ES numbers are even better looking for Canada.

    Bad goaltending, poor discipline and some bad luck made this a much closer series but even with these factors Canada was the dominant team. Put together the roster that swept the last three games and play them in an eight game series against the Soviets one hundred times and Canada wins the series between seventy five to eighty five times. Seriously. I don’t doubt that for a minute. And I never thought that would be the case.

    Not at all the narrative that has been hammered into a generation of Canadians: they were more skilled but our guys had heart and they were godless Commies who didn’t have heart so that’s why we won. We outchanced them like crazy according to Pat but we had lousy goaltending and a taste for dumb penalties. I digress.

    Since 2007-08, Tampa Bay has the worst rate of allowing goals on open play shot attempts – 5.0% of shot attempts against the Lightning turn into goals. The best rate has been that posted by the New York Rangers – 4.0% of shot attempts against them turn into goals. You’ll notice that this is awfully low.

    My thinking is that this is unlikely to affect things too much. The problem with talking about records when a team scores first is that right away you’re talking about their record in games in which they scored at least one goal. There aren’t a lot of goals in a hockey game. There are a lot of shot attempts.

    The other thing is that some of those goals are going to come following a sequence of shot attempts. That’s an interesting question and one that I may delve into in the future – do a disproportionate number of goals come on shifts with multiple shot attempts?.

    What this objection is really saying is “What if the numbers are skewed by the fact of some shot attempts turning into goals?” It’s probably worth doing a quick check on at some point but given that a) the vast majority of shot attempts don’t turn into goals and b) some of those goals will come following multiple shot attempts, I have serious doubts that it makes any significant difference.

    * * *

    So – onto some requests and guys who I looked up last night. If none of this makes sense to you, go and read the post leading up to this one. I’m going to generally present two graphs for each player: his raw SAA/100 and then where it ranks on a percentile basis. As I noted in the previous post, SAA/100 has been drifting upwards and it’s happened enough that what might have been poor in 2007-08 is good now. For that reason, as well as to make a sense of scale available to people, I’m including both.

    Douglas Murray

    Screen Shot 2013-09-20 at 4.22.29 PM

    Screen Shot 2013-09-20 at 4.22.43 PM

    It’s not a mistake that there’s no bar in the S.J. 2013 column for Murray’s percentile – he was the worst in the NHL, so there’s no percentile ranking showing. So, if you’re a San Jose fan who thought that Murray fell off the face of the planet, here’s a pretty strong data point in support of that. You sort of wonder why Pittsburgh traded for him and, after they decided to let him go despite spending two second round picks to get him, why Montreal decided to sink resources into him. I’d be shocked if he’s anything more than a third pairing guy in Montreal by the end of the year.

    Jeff Petry/Ladislav Smid

    Screen Shot 2013-09-20 at 4.22.51 PM

    Screen Shot 2013-09-20 at 4.23.07 PM

    There’s a lot of interesting stuff in there, I think. For all the talk about guys like Ladislav Smid maybe taking a step back in 2013, his SAA/100 was almost identical, year-over-year. I’ve talked a lot this summer about how the Oilers performance changed last year and Smid took the same hit that a lot of guys took – his Corsi% fell from 47.6% to 44.1%. It’s intriguing to me that this doesn’t really show up in his SAA/100 – he was basically the same as he was last year, in terms of how many shot attempts the opposition got after the first one. Logically, this suggests that teams were getting that first shot a lot more. This points, again, towards a change in what the Oilers did in 2013 that made it easier for teams to get that first shot.

    You’ll note that Petry’s number kind of bumped upwards this year. I’d guess that this happened when he was separated from Ladislav Smid. I included Justin Schultz because I think it’s instructive. There’s lots of muttering about what his second contract should look like now that he and Nail Yakupov are next in line. I’m less sold on Schultz than I was on RNH and Hall because I don’t think that the underlying numbers are really there for Schultz yet. Is a number one defenceman (even in the Mike Green mold) or is he more of an offensive whiz with defensive deficiencies that won’t resolve? I’m not critical of where he’s at; I just think people should be realistic about where he’s at. I’m looking forward to see how he does in his own end this year.

    Marc Methot

    Screen Shot 2013-09-20 at 4.23.17 PM

    Screen Shot 2013-09-20 at 4.23.25 PM

    Not sure I have too much interesting to say here. Pretty consistent up until last year, his first in Ottawa, when he played with Eric Gryba and Erik Karlsson. Maybe there’s a positive correlation between “partners named Eric/k” and SAA/100.

    Marian Hossa

    Screen Shot 2013-09-20 at 4.23.35 PM

    Screen Shot 2013-09-20 at 4.23.46 PM

    That 2007-08 Thrashers outfit was one of the great tire fires in NHL history. It’s interesting how Hossa’s actually put up decent numbers as far as SAA/100 since getting out of Atlanta. Obviously, numbers are going to be team dependent to an extent and it may be that wingers have less of an effect on this than most. If you’ve got bad centres and a defence corps that can’t get hold of the puck and move it, you’re probably not going to score well here.

    The New York Rangers: 2008-09 – 2013

    This…honestly, this needs an entire post and maybe more. It will get one.

    Alex Pietrangelo

    Screen Shot 2013-09-20 at 4.23.57 PM

    Screen Shot 2013-09-20 at 4.24.11 PM

    Breaking: the numbers say Alex Pietrangelo’s pretty awesome at this aspect of playing defence. The challenge in using numbers a lot of the time is looking at the number, understanding what it says about performance and then kind of challenging yourself to come up with ways in which the number might lie to you. It’s hard to think of a way in which the numbers could be lying about Pietrangelo here – he plays against the best and there’s no awesome defenceman hanging around who might be carrying him. It’s hard to find anything to dislike about the guy.

    Nicklas Lidstrom

    Screen Shot 2013-09-20 at 4.24.20 PM

    Screen Shot 2013-09-20 at 4.24.32 PM

    Age comes for us all. I’ve alluded to ratio of shifts with a SAF/SAA – Lidstrom aged a bit better there. He was still a good defenceman when he left the NHL but he wasn’t what he was. No shame in that but that 2010-11 Norris Trophy might be best understood as a parting gift.

    Sam Gagner/Shawn Horcoff

    Screen Shot 2013-09-20 at 4.24.44 PM

    Screen Shot 2013-09-20 at 4.24.56 PM

    I thought that this was a fitting pair on which to end things because it lets us start getting into thinking about the differences about players. Horcoff’s had a reputations as reasonably good player in his own end; Gagner has had a reputation as a guy who’s a bit small and loses position on guys from time to time. Sure enough, a difference shows up in the data. Keep in mind, Horcoff probably played against a higher class of player too, particularly in the early years, so the difference between the two of them is probably larger than it seems.

    Also of note: look how both guys posted awful numbers during the Quinn year and then reverted back to much better numbers the following year. Ultimately, as I’ve said time and time again, what I’m interested in is finding way to isolate differences between players, to shine a light on questions like “How much does the difference between Sam Gagner and Shawn Horcoff defensively cost you?” I think that this stuff is a step in the right direction.

    I’ll end this here for now – I might throw up another one of these over the weekend. Requests outstanding include Keith Ballard pre/post Vancouver, Jordan Staal, John Erskine, Joe Thornton, Patrice Bergeron, Erik Cole, Ales Hemsky, John Carlson, Marc Andre Bergeron, Andy Greene and a comparison of Lubo and Ryan Whitney. If you’ve got one, feel free to drop it in the comments and I’ll see what I can do.

    Email Tyler Dellow at tyler@mc79hockey.com


    23 Responses to SAA/100 – Pietrangelo, Gagner, Lidstrom And More

    1. Brad
      September 20, 2013 at

      Since you mention Mike Green in your Justin Schultz comments, I’m curious to see how he looks here. And especially if there’s any way to add the context of how the team as a whole performs. He seems as if he’s rounded out his game over the years but neither he nor the team around him are what they were under the best Boudreau years. Just wondering if this bears out that perception (say, better at SAA and worse at SAF perhaps).

      • Peter Vetsch
        September 20, 2013 at

        Green would be an interesting tie-in to my Carlson request — as a consequence of Oates splitting up Alzner and Carlson this past season and putting Carlson with Erskine, Green got to play the bulk of the year with Alzner (generally seen as the best defensive D-man on the team). It would be interesting to see if the fact of playing with Alzner improved Green’s (this past season) and Carlson’s (the seasons prior) SAA/100 numbers significantly.

    2. speeds
      September 20, 2013 at

      I would be interested in a general comparison between defensemen generally considered to be offensive D vs. defensive D. ie. some grouping of guys like J.Schultz, Green, MA Bergeron, Yandle vs. Matt Greene, Fistric, Gill, Smid, etc

      There are obviously a lot of factors to control for and consider there, just wondering if you might see anything there generally, as opposed to specific to one player.

    3. Saj
      September 20, 2013 at

      I’d be interested to know what role luck (e.g. bounces, teammates etc) is playing in the variations in player performance from year to year. Have you looked at correlating all players’ year N SAA/100 vs year (N+1) SAA/100 to get an estimate of how strong the skill effect is in determining this stat?

      • Tyler Dellow
        September 21, 2013 at

        That’s something I’ll touch on in a future post.

    4. hnatty19
      September 20, 2013 at

      What about Erik Karlsson? I’m intrigued to see what his numbers show in that when he came into the league he was routinely bashed for being bad defensively (based primarily on his plus/minus). Within 2 years he had won a Norris.

      Do the numbers support a meteoric improvement in his game or was he underrated when he came into league or, alternatively, overrated when he won his Norris.

      Would be interested to see what how he figures into all this.

    5. Jesse
      September 20, 2013 at

      Interested to see how Hall and Eberle look according to this metric, especially after the narrative that’s popped up about Hall being poor in his own end. Also, I recall last year seeing Eberle do a lot of early exits out of his own zone and I wonder if that sort of practice would show up in these numbers.

    6. ryan
      September 20, 2013 at

      I’d be interested to see how the Sedins fared over time. It would be neat to see if they’ve always been under appreciated defensively or if they really did take a big step last year.

    7. September 20, 2013 at

      So… with your note on the New York Rangers, it may be wise to bet against the Canucks at every opportunity?

      • Peachy
        September 21, 2013 at

        I can only hope (as a Canucks fan) that it’s related to Tyler’s earlier comment regarding the NYR allowing shot attempts to be converted to shots at the lowest rate in the league.

        I suppose we’ll find out…

    8. chris
      September 21, 2013 at

      I felt like subban was top five dmen in the league before last season and want to challenge that thought with the data

    9. Ryan V
      September 21, 2013 at

      “Since 2007-08, Tampa Bay has the worst rate of allowing goals on open play shot attempts – 5.0% of shot attempts against the Lightning turn into goals. The best rate has been that posted by the New York Rangers – 4.0% of shot attempts against them turn into goals. You’ll notice that this is awfully low.”

      To me, you’re really burying the lede here. This seems like the most important tidbit you’ve uncovered in the whole big data/new metrics series.

      • Brad
        September 21, 2013 at

        Depending on how stable those numbers are year to year, is that a big nail in the coffin of the “systems that generate quality shots” narrative? Unless I’m misinterpreting (and, granted, faceoff plays that would excluded from that number may be more susceptible to creative coaching and set plays, though I’d consider those outside the common narrative).

    10. Trentent
      September 21, 2013 at

      Seems to me that coaching styles appear to have a big effect on this metric as well. Maybe this metric is better suited to measuring a coaches performance as opposed to the players? The unfortunate thing about it is you can only accurately measure a coaches performance against the same team.

      From your stats I read that Mactavish and Renney were better coaches than Quinn and Kruger. Would the Oilers have made the playoffs last year with Renney? Maybe not but I suspect they would have had a better record.

    11. June 9, 2014 at

      Good way of describing, and fastidious paragraph to get data concerning my
      presentation subject matter, which i am going to present in school.

    12. June 20, 2014 at

      fantastic issues altogether, you just received a logo new
      reader. What may you suggest in regards to your post that you made a few days in the past?

      Any positive?

    13. June 21, 2014 at

      Hurrah! Finally I got a blog from where I be able to in fact get useful data concerning my study and knowledge.

    14. June 24, 2014 at

      What’s up it’s me, I am also visiting this site regularly, this web site is genuinely fastidious and the viewers are in fact sharing fastidious thoughts.

    15. June 27, 2014 at

      ‘There are three FIFA World Cup winners in the group, so
      it is definitely a difficult group. Andres Iniesta Iniesta
      is a flat-out big game player. Mexico could
      wake up and provide some competition, but unless current coach Miguel
      Herrera, reverts to bringing in the likes of his international stars
      the Tri will be hard put to offer much resistance.

    16. June 28, 2014 at

      Hello there, You have done an incredible job.

      I will certainly digg it and personally suggest to my friends.

      I am confident they will be benefited from this website.

    17. June 28, 2014 at

      We absolutely love your blog and find nearly all of your post’s to be precisely what I’m looking for.
      Do you offer guest writers to write content for yourself? I wouldn’t mind producing a post
      or elaborating on most of the subjects you write related to
      here. Again, awesome weblog!

    18. July 19, 2014 at

      Attempting to make your ex-spouse jealous is among the worst things you can do if
      you intend to get back with your ex, considering that all it is visiting
      do is show him that you have actually gone on and that
      he ought to do the very same. As an alternative, you desire him to
      assume that he was the very best point in your life, and that nobody
      as compares to just what he needed to provide
      you. By increasing his self-confidence without appearing needy, he will quickly realize the
      two of you were wonderful with each other regardless of the little fight or differences.
      Also, stay away from obtaining upset if he is viewing
      other people, due to the fact that you will not manage to stop it regardless of what you attempt.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *