• Judge finds former NHLer used steroids

    by  • November 9, 2011 • NHL • 5 Comments

    There were a couple of stories in the newspapers last week about a fellow named Garrett Burnett, who played briefly in the NHL in 2003-04, appearing 39 times for the Ducks and accumulating a goal, a pair of assists and an astonishing 184 PIM. I’m not much of a goon aficionado so Burnett kind of escaped my attention when he played. The stories arose out of a piece of litigation involving Burnett after he was beaten up in a bar. The CTV.ca story on the matter contained a line referencing Burnett’s lawyer acknowledging his past steroid use but it seems to have been the only entity to mention the steroids angle.

    The reasons for the decision are online and contain some pretty amazing stuff:

    [56] Mr. Burnett…denied ever using anabolic steroids, but said he used supplements that would parallel the kind of benefit he would get from steroids, but “without breaking the law”. He would get the supplements from supplement stores in the U.S. and Canada.

    [57] Mr. Burnett saw a Dr. Lee in California, where he was prescribed several medications including testosterone, but testified it had to do with his own sexual heath, not to counteract the effects of steroids. He never failed any tests for the use of steroids or other drugs during his hockey career…

    [59] In cross-examination, Mr. Burnett was probed about the use of “enhancements” for his hockey career. Although he maintained that he only used supplements that mimic the effects of anabolic steroids and his use of testosterone and other drugs had nothing to do with off-setting the effects of actual steroid use, I am satisfied on all the evidence including his examination for discovery on the balance of probabilities that the plaintiff did indeed use steroids to enhance his performance as a professional athlete. Indeed, in argument, his counsel fairly conceded that likelihood and attributed the plaintiff’s reticence to admit it to the effect of his head injury and accompanying diminished judgment.

    [77] Dr. Kennedy reviewed the clinical records of Dr. Lester Lee who prescribed various medications to [Mr. Burnett] in California. In his report of January 10, 2011, Dr. Kennedy detailed his review of Dr. Lee’s notes as follows:

    Opinion: Anabolic steroid use has many and varied long term toxic effects. The likelihood of both short and long term toxic effects is greatly increased with the use of multiple steroid drugs at the same time in various patterns. A common pattern is 1 to 3 times weekly injections, in 4 to 12 week cycles. Dr. Lester Lee’s notes from January 2004 to June 2006 describe such a coincident multiplicity of steroid drug use by Mr. Burnett over this time. He already has toxic effects of previous anabolic steroid use when he sees Dr. Lee in January, 2004: hypogonadism (long term effect), low HDL cholesterol (increased cardiac risk), and mild liver damage (short term effect). Over this time, Dr. Lee further prescribes both oil-based and injectible steroids, and other oral agents. These drugs include human Growth Hormone (GH) for muscle bulk and strength, human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) and Clomid to stimulate testosterone production, and Tamoxifen to block the effects of steroid-induced estrogen (gynecomastia). He has this tender breast enlargement toxic effect of steroid use during the time that he saw Dr. Lee. Also during this time he had a thigh abscess, secondary to oil-based steroid injection, another acute side effect. Dr. Lee also prescribed Zoloft, an anti depressant, implying that Dr. Lee has diagnosed a mood disorder.

    Georges Laraque is in the news right now with his allegations about drug use in the NHL. While I find Georges to be a bit of a questionable witness (and was greatly entertained by Jeff Blair painting him as very credible, given his past comments about Laraque), reading this decision makes me wonder. I don’t like the way that Laraque has gone about accusing people – by not naming names but instead describing ways to identify steroid users, he invites people to speculate wildly about who was using, something that isn’t really fair to players who weren’t using but might fit Georges’ criteria of having an off year during Olympic years.

    I’m ambivalent about steroids as a moral issue but if the question is how credible the denials of a problem with steroids are, when you’ve got a doctor giving evidence that a 29 year old guy has “toxic effects of previous anabolic steroid use…in January of 2004″ and a judge finding that a player used steroids to enhance his performance as a professional athlete, it seems to me to certainly raise some questions. Dick Pound has raised what seem to me to be reasonable objections to the NHL’s drug testing regimen and suggested that it has a variety of holes.

    If steroids are a big moral issue in sport, how much evidence do we need to decide that what the NHL is doing is insufficient? You’re unlikely to ever have a smoking gun in a case like this – players and the NHL have an incentive to keep failed tests quiet. Instead what you get are cases like the one discussed above, with a snippet of evidence, or someone like Laraque making some loose allegations. I don’t really know what the answer is but, given the holes in the NHL’s policy and the evidence that the incentives are such that people used before, I don’t know why you’d think that NHL hockey is clean now.


    5 Responses to Judge finds former NHLer used steroids

    1. Roke
      November 9, 2011 at

      Good find as usual.

      I can see the incentives for steroid (or other PED use) in the NHL: players have been devoting all of their effort toward becoming a hockey player with little effort toward alternatives, strength is important, and there’s a “play through the pain/injury” culture.

      Since I don’t think the NHL’s testing is very stringent I’m not sure if the NHL sees the incentives. I guess they might not care either.

      When I still listened to Prime Time Sports the subject of steroids in hockey came up and John Shannon said that they aren’t an issue because what they do to the body won’t help in the game of hockey. To me it sounded suspiciously like baseball batters needing to maintain their flexibility to generate power. I would not be surprised if Shannon’s view is commonly held in the NHL’s head office.

    2. Trentent
      November 10, 2011 at

      Steroids also help with speeding up recovery from injuries.

      Obviously Hemsky has never used steroids in his career. If he did and he was able to play 2x as many games over the last 3 seasons, would you consider them a negative in the game?

      Tough call, touch call…

    3. dave
      November 10, 2011 at

      Interesting stuff Tyler – I wonder what the testing procedures are in Hockey – must look that up

      By the way think you got under Chris Jones skin, judging by his recent Grantland piece …..

    4. RiversQ
      November 11, 2011 at

      What kind of idiot doesn’t think steroids help hockey players? That’s astonishing.

      If steroids work wonders for sprinters, they’ll do the same for hockey players.

      • Silver
        November 14, 2011 at

        Steroids are probably a small(er) part of it these days. Victor Conte thought that EPO was the most important drug for a sprinter, so it would be right up there for hockey players as well. HGH use is probably as common as toothbrushes at a dentist convention. Testosterone is undoubtedly widely used. Insulin as well in the offseason. They might even blood dope if the tiny amount of in-season surprise tests are actually surprise tests and there isn’t a little bird letting them know a week before. Once the playoffs start, there’s no testing at all.

        Almost no NHL player will be caught, because in order to be caught you have to be so stupid, you probably can’t breathe on your own. The NHL testing policy is set up to NOT catch people. No positive tests, no problems, right?

        I’ve had the happy experience of being a cycling fan for years. The idea that you could find a clean hockey player over the last 10 years is almost crazy to me. The benefits of using PEDs are so enormous, the financial rewards so high, and the testing system is useless. If you’re not using, you’re doing your career and your earning power a huge disservice.

        Or, it can all be explained by diet and exercise…you go to a summer camp and learn how to eat better and gain all that muscle. Sounds plausible, right?

        The more interesting question for me is where does this start? How many guys who career ceiling is ECHL 2nd liner are using in junior? I don’t even want to know.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *