• Flames Get Brad Stuart

    by  • February 11, 2007 • Uncategorized • 13 Comments

    Pretty interesting deal.  Calgary gets Wayne Primeau and Brad Stuart; Boston acquires Chuck Kobasew and Andrew Ference.  I didn’t know this but Ference was apparently a somewhat regular poster on Calgary Puck under the name of okotoker.  He’s a surprisingly well written guy – you don’t get the impression that that would be true of very many hockey players.  He posted the following on Calgary Puck after the deal was announced:

    Wow, I am sitting in a hotel room in Buffalo just trying to register everything right now. I really appreciate the kind words in the other thread, it means a lot to me to hear that. I honestly could not have been caught more off guard or thought I could be so sad to say bye to the guys. I have so much respect for the players in the locker room and if I can’t hold the cup I would love nothing more than to see my good friends do it there. Thanks again for all of the kind words and for being such great fans, it was truly special for me to play for the Flames and come across so many wonderful people during that time. Thanks, Andrew Ference, Go Bruins

    That’s really unfortunate for him – Calgary’s a fantastic shot to come out of the West and he’s moving to Boston.  The B’s have an interesting team going forward, I think, which is something that Ference will be a part of as he’s signed at a reasonable rate for some time to come but geez.  If Calgary makes a run, Marty Reasoner should give him a call and share the pain.

    From Boston’s perspective, this is a better deal than the one that they made for Sergei Samsonov last year, which struck me as quite possibly the stupidest trade deadline deal, I’ve ever seen, in terms of getting something that will help in the future.  Chuck Kobasew is signed for another year before he becomes an RFA; Ference is signed through 2009-10.  I’m not sure what there is to say about Chuck Kobasew – I don’t think he’s a very good player.  He’s a guy who couldn’t establish himself on a Flames team that was desperate for offence.  He’s in his age 24 season, has to score be worth anything and hasn’t done it yet.  He’s not the kind of player who you build a team around.

    I don’t think that there can be any doubt that the Flames are better off with Stuart than they were without him.  I’m interested to see where they are for next year though.  They’ve now got 12 guys signed for next year at about $30.5MM, give or take.  There’s some discussion that next year might be difficult for the Flames – I don’t see it.  They’re not losing anyone significant.  They look like they’ll have $18MM to replace Tony Amonte, Jeff Friesen, Marcus Nilson, Darren McCarty, Byron Ritchie, Roman Hamrlik and Jamie McLennan.  Mark Giordano and Matt Lombardi need new contracts as well.  You can now add Brad Stuart and Wayne Primeau to the list.

    The only thing that’s a little misleading is that while the Flames have that money to sign guys, they aren’t really going to be in a position to be offering anyone term with the looming Judgment Day of July 1, 2008 when Jarome Iginla, Miikka Kiprusoff and Robyn Regehr all become UFA’s.  There’s no reason that they can’t put together as good or better of a team for next year though; one more year…one more year…one more year…


    13 Responses to Flames Get Brad Stuart

    1. February 11, 2007 at

      Joni Pitkanen or Derek Morris will now cost a First round plus a roster player.


      Although I doubt Torres or Lupul goes away. EDM is deep at centre (even with Petr ‘Luggage’ Nedved) Stoll, Reasoner, Sykora, Petersen, Thoresen(?), Nedved, Pouliot, Schremp, Brodziak.

      Good deal for CGY, I heard they also get a conditional first round if Stuart does not resign, that’s highway robbery.

    2. Pat
      February 11, 2007 at

      Great trade for the Flames, even with Stuart being a UFA.

      I like Ference a lot and one of the reasons is that he is a well spoken and thoughtful young guy. Has different interests – not your typical hockey player for sure.

      I agree on Kobasew and with these other kids coming up he was expendable anyway. I think they figure Giordano or Reghyr the younger will replace Ference.

    3. DD
      February 11, 2007 at

      The conditional first makes this pretty lopsided. First round picks might be overrated in general but not when they could potentially be a top 5 pick. And as a bit of a draftnik, next year’s draft is going to have some elite talent up at the top part of the first rouond.

    4. speeds
      February 11, 2007 at

      the conditional pick is WSH’s 4th rounder(acquired in the Jurcina deal), according to:


      which though it’s a blog is on BOS’s official site, so I’d imagine the source is pretty good.

    5. mc79hockey
      February 11, 2007 at

      Wait, Calgary gets a conditional pick if he doesn’t resign? Jesus.

      Also, I saw Ference’s name in the news earlier this week whining about the environment. I imagine that this was entirely a punishment trade.

    6. speeds
      February 11, 2007 at

      It’ll be interesting to see what they do with Stuart. If they can get him signed to a 4 year deal that’s at least a bit of insurance should Regehr hit the market in summer 08.

    7. Boondock
      February 11, 2007 at

      Ouch, poor guy seems to have taken less money to stay in CGY, only to get shipped out.


    8. February 11, 2007 at

      I didn’t realize that he posted with the fans like that. I remember seeing this
      feature a while ago and thinking he seemed like a cutie. I’m glad to have him on the Bruins, but they don’t yet have an “interesting” team. They COULD have an interesting team if they build on it right, but never trust Bruins management to do anything right.

    9. mc79hockey
      February 11, 2007 at

      That’s a well written site you have there Katie. You spelled “defenceman” wrong though.

    10. February 11, 2007 at

      Haha, us Americans spell everything wrong.

    11. February 11, 2007 at

      You hang in there Katie. You’re spelling of defensemen is just fine. :-)

    12. February 12, 2007 at

      Thanks for the support, Lowetide. :-P Last year a girl on my team freaked out because she accidentally spelled it “defence” on a t-shirt she was making, so this “c” thing is pretty foreign to me. Though considering the game, “c” is probably right…er.

    13. February 12, 2007 at

      When I was a kid they had Defence on one side of the hockey card and Defense on the other. I had no clue about what was better but still spell it defense because that’s how I learned it and I’m too old to change now.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *